<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The BCS Heads To Washington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everydayqb.com/2009/03/26/the-bcs-heads-to-washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everydayqb.com/2009/03/26/the-bcs-heads-to-washington/</link>
	<description>A Game Plan To Tackle Life Head On Every Day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayqb.com/2009/03/26/the-bcs-heads-to-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayqb.com/?p=198#comment-351</guid>
		<description>There obviously needs to be a playoff, but will the powers that be quit being stubborn and allow their beloved BCS to be eliminated as it is? Then, there&#039;s the debate on how many teams to include in the playoff. 4? 8? 12? Then, whoever is No. 5, No. 9 or No. 13 will complain about being left out. Same with whatever other number you go with. I just don&#039;t see it happening because of logistics to change and stubbornness, but mainly stubbornness.

If it was my call, the top 8 teams in the BCS rankings make the playoffs. No. 1 plays No. 8, 2 vs. 7, 3 vs. 6, and 4 vs. 5. Then the national champion has to earn the trophy by winning three games.

Let the debate continue...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There obviously needs to be a playoff, but will the powers that be quit being stubborn and allow their beloved BCS to be eliminated as it is? Then, there&#8217;s the debate on how many teams to include in the playoff. 4? 8? 12? Then, whoever is No. 5, No. 9 or No. 13 will complain about being left out. Same with whatever other number you go with. I just don&#8217;t see it happening because of logistics to change and stubbornness, but mainly stubbornness.</p>
<p>If it was my call, the top 8 teams in the BCS rankings make the playoffs. No. 1 plays No. 8, 2 vs. 7, 3 vs. 6, and 4 vs. 5. Then the national champion has to earn the trophy by winning three games.</p>
<p>Let the debate continue&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayqb.com/2009/03/26/the-bcs-heads-to-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayqb.com/?p=198#comment-226</guid>
		<description>I like that they are taking a hard look at the ranking system, but to act like it&#039;s a new problem is silly. Also why is it the governments job to tell the BCS how to run their bowl games? It just seems silly to me. With all the crap going on in the world is this that important? I&#039;d prefer if Utah and the others teamed up and fought the system without the government. It would be a testament to college football if it was the teams that fixed the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that they are taking a hard look at the ranking system, but to act like it&#8217;s a new problem is silly. Also why is it the governments job to tell the BCS how to run their bowl games? It just seems silly to me. With all the crap going on in the world is this that important? I&#8217;d prefer if Utah and the others teamed up and fought the system without the government. It would be a testament to college football if it was the teams that fixed the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

